Rule 4

Consent Manager registration opens13 Nov 2026

myconsent+

The platform

Seven duties. One record.

The Act does not ask for seven products. It asks a Data Fiduciary to know what it processes, why, on whose consent, for how long, and who else touches it — and to be able to show the answer. These are the parts of that answer.

Modules
7
M1–M7
Record they share
1
Sec. 8(1)
Scheduled languages
22
Eighth Schedule
Cross-border by default
0
Sec. 16 · Rule 15

How the modules meet

A processing activity

Everything in the platform hangs off one row. These define it:

  • RoPAone row per activity
  • DPIAassesses the row

And these act on it:

  • Consent Managerattaches to its purposes
  • Cookie Consentthe browser surface
  • Rights & Grievanceanswers against it
  • Breach Notificationreports on it
  • Vendor Riskwho else touches it
The register is the spine. A module that cannot name the row it acts on is a feature rather than part of the platform.
Sec. 8(1)

Suites fail at the join

Most compliance tooling is a set of registers that do not know about each other. The consent tool holds purposes. The spreadsheet holds processing activities. Nothing connects a withdrawal to the activity it should stop, so the connecting is done by a person, once a quarter, from memory.

Sec. 8(1) makes the Data Fiduciary answerable for processing carried out on its behalf, irrespective of any agreement to the contrary. That is a duty you discharge with a join, not with a folder. Every module here writes to the same activity row, so a withdrawal, an erasure request and a breach report all resolve to the same place.

3 modules are available today. The rest say early access or roadmap on their own tile, because a platform page that reads as finished when it is not is the same failure in a different register.

Next step

Start from the register

Most teams arrive wanting a consent banner and leave having discovered they cannot say what they process. The register is the cheapest place to find that out.